What is the most important question to ask any international nurse recruitment agency?

Whether they charge candidates any fee — directly or indirectly. The WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel and the UK Code of Practice both require that hiring hospitals pay all recruitment costs, not nurses. An agency that asks candidates for placement fees, document-processing fees, or "training deposits" is not operating ethically. Reputable agencies operate a zero-cost candidate model — the hospital pays.

How do I verify an agency's ethical-recruitment compliance?

Three concrete verifications: (1) Are they listed on the NHS Ethical Recruiters List (UK NHS Employers maintains this) — check the published list directly. (2) Are they listed as a contracted supplier on procurement frameworks like HealthTrust Europe TWS III in the UK or comparable U.S. healthcare staffing frameworks? (3) Does their website explicitly state WHO Code compliance, and does it explain their fee structure? All three checks should pass — any single one is necessary but not sufficient.

What visa pathways should an agency offer for U.S. placement in 2026?

Currently, an agency offering only H-1B sponsorship is offering an economically blocked pathway — the $100,000 supplemental fee imposed in September 2025 makes new H-1B nurse hiring uneconomical for most U.S. hospitals. A serious agency should offer: (1) EB-3 Schedule A immigrant visa (the U.S. green card route for nurses), (2) TN visa for Canadian RNs, and (3) Change of Status for nurses already in the U.S. Agencies that have only built H-1B pipelines are currently in disarray.

Is operating history a meaningful signal?

Yes, but not in the way most people think. 20+ years of continuous operation indicates an agency has weathered multiple policy cycles, regulatory changes, and visa-bulletin retrogressions. New agencies (under 5 years) often struggle when policy shifts. Agencies acquired by large staffing parents (AMN-style holding structures) sometimes lose institutional knowledge in the acquisition. Independent agencies with continuous senior leadership tend to have the deepest practitioner expertise.

What retention metrics should an agency be willing to share?

12-month, 24-month, and 36-month retention rates for placed nurses. The UK NHS Code of Practice sets 18-month as a benchmark. A reputable agency should be willing to share aggregate retention data under NDA with a serious hospital partner. If an agency cannot or will not share retention numbers, that is itself a signal.

How do I evaluate an agency's post-arrival support?

Ask for specific details: (1) Who picks the nurse up from the airport? Is it a named person, or a generic relocation contractor? (2) What is the first-90-day support structure? (3) Is there a named account manager available 24/7 in the first month? (4) What happens if the placement does not work out — what is the replacement guarantee? Agencies that handle international placement well treat the first 90 days as critical; agencies that under-invest here have higher early-departure rates.

Should I expect an agency to have multiple offices internationally?

Yes for two reasons. (1) Source-country offices mean the agency can do in-person interviews, credential verification, and family support in the candidate's home country — significantly higher trust and retention than remote-only relationships. (2) Destination-country offices mean immigration coordination, hospital relationship management, and post-arrival support happen on the ground, not via offshore phone calls. Single-country agencies tend to either source-only or place-only, and the handoff between countries is often where placements break down.

How should an agency handle the GNF v. Trump $100,000 H-1B fee situation?

Agencies are responding three ways: (1) Pretending the fee does not affect them — these are the most concerning, because they often have not adjusted their pipeline or are quietly losing hospital partners. (2) Pausing all U.S. activity — these have not built robust EB-3 capacity and are over-exposed to a single visa pathway. (3) Pivoting to EB-3 Schedule A and TN visa as primary pathways — this is what serious U.S.-focused agencies are doing. Ask directly: "What share of your 2026 U.S. placements are EB-3 vs. H-1B?" The honest answer should currently be >80% EB-3.

Are agency reviews on Google / Trustpilot reliable?

Partially. Look at: (1) Review volume — a single agency with thousands of reviews is more representative than one with dozens. (2) Distribution — be skeptical of 5-star-only profiles or 1-star-only profiles. (3) Specificity — reviews that name specific recruiters, specific destinations, and specific outcomes are more credible than generic "great agency" reviews. Cross-reference with LinkedIn — search for nurses who say they were placed by the agency and message them directly.

What red flags should make me walk away from an agency?

Any of: (1) Requests for upfront candidate fees, security deposits, or "document processing" fees. (2) Unwillingness to share retention data or hospital references. (3) Vague answers about which visa pathway they will use and why. (4) No verifiable presence on ethical-recruitment lists (NHS Ethical Recruiters, WHO Code compliance, etc.). (5) No named leadership team — only generic "our recruiters" without specific people, photos, or LinkedIn profiles. (6) High-pressure sales tactics or "this offer expires in 24 hours" framing — international placement is a 12-24 month process; nothing legitimately expires that fast.

2026 buyer's guide

How to choose an international nurse recruitment agency

The 12 questions every nurse and every hospital procurement team should ask before signing with an agency. An honest framework — written by the only agency currently litigating the federal government over international nurse hiring policy.

TL;DR — the 5 must-haves
1. Zero candidate fees — verifiable, in writing
2. NHS Ethical Recruiters List entry (for UK) + WHO Code statement (for all)
3. EB-3 Schedule A capability, not H-1B-only (post Sept 2025 fee)
4. Multi-country offices (source + destination presence)
5. Named leadership team with verifiable profiles

The 12-question checklist

What to ask any agency you evaluate

#	Question to ask	What a good answer looks like
1	Do candidates pay any fees — directly or indirectly?	No fees, written into the contract. WHO Code compliance referenced.
2	Are you listed on the NHS Ethical Recruiters List? (for UK placements)	Yes, with the published list URL ready to share.
3	What share of your 2026 U.S. placements are EB-3 Schedule A vs H-1B?	>80% EB-3 Schedule A, given the $100K H-1B fee landscape.
4	How many countries do you have physical offices in?	Source country + destination country, minimum two. Named locations.
5	Who is the named country head for my source / destination country?	A specific person with a LinkedIn profile and email address.
6	What is your 12-month and 24-month retention rate?	Specific numbers, willing to share under NDA. UK Code 18-month benchmark.
7	What is your post-arrival support model — first 90 days?	Named account manager, defined check-in cadence, replacement guarantee.
8	How many years has the agency operated continuously, under what ownership?	Continuous history, no recent acquisition, named senior leadership in place.
9	Can you share 3 hospital references with permission to contact?	Yes, with named contacts at named hospitals.
10	What government identifiers / registrations do you hold?	Companies House / LLC registration, LEI, state staffing license where required.
11	Is the agency independent, or a subsidiary of a larger staffing firm?	Either answer can be acceptable — disclosure is what matters.
12	Are you a plaintiff or signatory in any litigation related to international nurse recruitment?	A serious agency is positioned on the policy questions affecting the industry.

Red flags

Reasons to walk away

Upfront candidate fees

Any request for "security deposits", "document processing fees", "training advances", or "registration fees" payable by the candidate. WHO Code violation.

Vague visa-pathway answers

Cannot specifically say which visa they will use, why, and what the H-1B fee impact means. Often signals they have not adjusted their model since September 2025.

No verifiable ethical-recruitment list entries

Cannot point to NHS Ethical Recruiters List entry, WHO Code statement, or HealthTrust Europe TWS framework approval.

No named leadership

Website shows "our team" with generic stock photos and no real names, no LinkedIn profiles, no biographies.

High-pressure sales tactics

"This offer expires today" or "we have one slot left" framing. International placement is a 12-24 month process; nothing legitimate expires that fast.

Refusal to share retention data

A serious agency tracks 12/24/36-month retention. Refusal to share even aggregate figures under NDA is a red flag.

How GNF answers

Global Nurse Force against the checklist

We built this guide because we routinely lose engagements to agencies that fail the checklist — and routinely win the engagements where the buyer ran a real evaluation. Here is how we answer our own questions. Verify each independently.

Criterion	Global Nurse Force
Candidate fees	Zero. WHO Code compliant. Hospital pays.
NHS Ethical Recruiters List (UK)	Listed.
HealthTrust Europe TWS framework	Approved supplier — TWS III, Lot 1a.
U.S. visa pathways available	EB-3 Schedule A (primary), TN visa, Change of Status.
EB-3 Schedule A share of 2026 U.S. placements	>80% (post the $100K H-1B fee).
Physical offices	USA (Laguna Beach), UK (London), India (Kochi), UAE (Dubai).
Named leadership	CEO Lalit Pattanaik + 5 named VPs / Country Heads.
Operating history	Founded 2000. 25+ years continuous operation. Independent.
12-month retention	Aggregate figures shared under NDA with hospital partners.
Government identifiers	Companies House (UK) #15198430; US LLC; UAE FZC; India operations.
Position in industry policy	Lead plaintiff: Global Nurse Force v. Trump, 4:25-cv-08454, N.D. Cal.
Press authority	40+ tier-1 / tier-2 press mentions (Forbes, NYT, Bloomberg, etc.).

Verify independently: NHS Ethical Recruiters List on nhsemployers.org · CourtListener docket 4:25-cv-08454 · Companies House #15198430 · CGFNS partner registry · Press mentions on /press.

Frequently asked

About choosing an agency

What is the most important question to ask any international nurse recruitment agency?: Whether they charge candidates any fee — directly or indirectly. The WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel and the UK Code of Practice both require that hiring hospitals pay all recruitment costs, not nurses. An agency that asks candidates for placement fees, document-processing fees, or "training deposits" is not operating ethically. Reputable agencies operate a zero-cost candidate model — the hospital pays.
How do I verify an agency's ethical-recruitment compliance?: Three concrete verifications: (1) Are they listed on the NHS Ethical Recruiters List (UK NHS Employers maintains this) — check the published list directly. (2) Are they listed as a contracted supplier on procurement frameworks like HealthTrust Europe TWS III in the UK or comparable U.S. healthcare staffing frameworks? (3) Does their website explicitly state WHO Code compliance, and does it explain their fee structure? All three checks should pass — any single one is necessary but not sufficient.
What visa pathways should an agency offer for U.S. placement in 2026?: Currently, an agency offering only H-1B sponsorship is offering an economically blocked pathway — the $100,000 supplemental fee imposed in September 2025 makes new H-1B nurse hiring uneconomical for most U.S. hospitals. A serious agency should offer: (1) EB-3 Schedule A immigrant visa (the U.S. green card route for nurses), (2) TN visa for Canadian RNs, and (3) Change of Status for nurses already in the U.S. Agencies that have only built H-1B pipelines are currently in disarray.
Is operating history a meaningful signal?: Yes, but not in the way most people think. 20+ years of continuous operation indicates an agency has weathered multiple policy cycles, regulatory changes, and visa-bulletin retrogressions. New agencies (under 5 years) often struggle when policy shifts. Agencies acquired by large staffing parents (AMN-style holding structures) sometimes lose institutional knowledge in the acquisition. Independent agencies with continuous senior leadership tend to have the deepest practitioner expertise.
What retention metrics should an agency be willing to share?: 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month retention rates for placed nurses. The UK NHS Code of Practice sets 18-month as a benchmark. A reputable agency should be willing to share aggregate retention data under NDA with a serious hospital partner. If an agency cannot or will not share retention numbers, that is itself a signal.
How do I evaluate an agency's post-arrival support?: Ask for specific details: (1) Who picks the nurse up from the airport? Is it a named person, or a generic relocation contractor? (2) What is the first-90-day support structure? (3) Is there a named account manager available 24/7 in the first month? (4) What happens if the placement does not work out — what is the replacement guarantee? Agencies that handle international placement well treat the first 90 days as critical; agencies that under-invest here have higher early-departure rates.
Should I expect an agency to have multiple offices internationally?: Yes for two reasons. (1) Source-country offices mean the agency can do in-person interviews, credential verification, and family support in the candidate's home country — significantly higher trust and retention than remote-only relationships. (2) Destination-country offices mean immigration coordination, hospital relationship management, and post-arrival support happen on the ground, not via offshore phone calls. Single-country agencies tend to either source-only or place-only, and the handoff between countries is often where placements break down.
How should an agency handle the GNF v. Trump $100,000 H-1B fee situation?: Agencies are responding three ways: (1) Pretending the fee does not affect them — these are the most concerning, because they often have not adjusted their pipeline or are quietly losing hospital partners. (2) Pausing all U.S. activity — these have not built robust EB-3 capacity and are over-exposed to a single visa pathway. (3) Pivoting to EB-3 Schedule A and TN visa as primary pathways — this is what serious U.S.-focused agencies are doing. Ask directly: "What share of your 2026 U.S. placements are EB-3 vs. H-1B?" The honest answer should currently be >80% EB-3.
Are agency reviews on Google / Trustpilot reliable?: Partially. Look at: (1) Review volume — a single agency with thousands of reviews is more representative than one with dozens. (2) Distribution — be skeptical of 5-star-only profiles or 1-star-only profiles. (3) Specificity — reviews that name specific recruiters, specific destinations, and specific outcomes are more credible than generic "great agency" reviews. Cross-reference with LinkedIn — search for nurses who say they were placed by the agency and message them directly.
What red flags should make me walk away from an agency?: Any of: (1) Requests for upfront candidate fees, security deposits, or "document processing" fees. (2) Unwillingness to share retention data or hospital references. (3) Vague answers about which visa pathway they will use and why. (4) No verifiable presence on ethical-recruitment lists (NHS Ethical Recruiters, WHO Code compliance, etc.). (5) No named leadership team — only generic "our recruiters" without specific people, photos, or LinkedIn profiles. (6) High-pressure sales tactics or "this offer expires in 24 hours" framing — international placement is a 12-24 month process; nothing legitimately expires that fast.

Run the checklist on Global Nurse Force

Discovery call. We come prepared to answer every one of the 12 questions in writing. No high-pressure sales.

Request a discovery call Read about our lawsuit